Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research

In the context of escalating climate challenges and growing societal expectations, organizations are increasingly called upon to embed sustainable practices into governance and strategic planning. This conceptual article examines the strategic role of the Integrated Management System (IMS) in aligning carbon finance initiatives with sustainable development strategies. Drawing on a structured literature review of carbon finance mechanisms, sustainability frameworks, and management system standards, including ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 45001, and ISO 50001, as well as reporting frameworks such as GRI and EFQM, the study identifies key variables and their interactions. The proposed conceptual model differentiates independent variables (carbon finance practices and sustainability strategies), a mediating variable (IMS), and dependent variables (overall organizational performance across economic, environmental, and social dimensions). Findings suggest that the IMS serves as a central mediator, structuring, coordinating, and sustaining the integration of sustainability initiatives within organizational processes. This approach enhances coherence, reduces fragmentation, and strengthens governance and transparency. The model provides theoretical insights into the interplay between carbon finance, sustainability strategies, and management systems while offering practical guidance for organizations seeking measurable, long-term sustainable performance. It also establishes a foundation for future empirical research to validate and adapt the framework across different sectors and geographic contexts.

Integrated Management System (IMS), Carbon Finance, Sustainable Development, Strategic Governance, Overall Performance, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), ISO Standards, Ecological Transition.

1. GRI. (2021). GRI Standards – Global Reporting Initiative. Amsterdam: GRI.
2. Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(1), 32–44.
3. Kotchen, M. J. (2021). Which carbon offsets do more harm than good? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(17).
4. TCFD. (2017). Final Report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Basel: Financial Stability Board.
5. CDP. (2022). Carbon Disclosure Project Reports and Scoring Methodology. London: CDP.
6. Klein, J., & Delaunay, C. (2018). Management intégré QSE : vers une performance durable. Paris: AFNOR Éditions.
7. ISO. (2015). ISO 9001:2015 – Quality Management Systems – Requirements. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
8. ISO. (2018a). ISO 45001:2018 – Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems – Requirements. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
9. ISO. (2018b). ISO 50001:2018 – Energy Management Systems – Requirements and Recommendations. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.