Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research

Indonesia’s experience with tax amnesty presents a major policy paradox. The government has relied on tax amnesty and voluntary disclosure to expand the tax base and raise short-term revenue. Yet, repeated amnesty programs and subsequent audit initiatives have raised concerns about policy consistency and institutional credibility. This article uses a qualitative literature review rather than a systematic literature review to examine how the consistency of Indonesia’s tax-amnesty policy affects trust in the tax system and, in turn, taxpayer compliance. Drawing on journal articles, official policy materials, and policy commentaries published mainly since 2020, the article synthesizes evidence on three issues: the conceptual foundations of tax amnesty, the indicators of amnesty success, and the implications of post-amnesty enforcement for taxpayer trust. The analysis shows that Indonesia’s first tax amnesty in 2016–2017 generated exceptional short-term outcomes, but the 2022 Voluntary Disclosure Program attracted far fewer participants and lower declared assets, indicating a decline in confidence and a narrower policy scope. The 2026 policy discourse on re-examining tax amnesty and PPS participants intensified concerns that the state may be shifting from a trust-building to a revenue-maximizing posture. This weakens the perceived credibility of amnesty promises and risks reinforcing the public narrative that tax amnesty is a trap rather than a pathway to normalized compliance. The article concludes that Indonesia needs a more consistent post-amnesty framework, clearer rules for follow-up audits, and a stronger trust-based approach to tax administration to achieve durable increases in voluntary compliance.

tax amnesty, voluntary disclosure, taxpayer trust, tax compliance, policy consistency, institutional legitimacy, Indonesia, qualitative literature review, tax morale, tax administration

1. E. Le Borgne and K. Baer, Tax Amnesties: Theory, Trends, and Some Alternatives. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund, 2008. doi: 10.5089/9781589067363.058.
2. F. Inasius, G. Darijanto, E. Gani, and G. Soepriyanto, “Tax Compliance After the Implementation of Tax Amnesty in Indonesia,” Sage Open, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244020968793.
3. S. Novita, M. Somya Lasmana, N. A. Mohd Yusof, R. Safeei, and L. Chai Chuen, “Trust in Government and Tax Compliance in Indonesia and Malaysia: Do Ethics and Tax Amnesty Matter?,” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 10–22, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.32479/ijefi.16925.
4. A. Rifaldo, “A Decade of Jokowi’s Tax Policies,” DJP Beranda. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pajak.go.id/en/artikel/decade-jokowis-tax-policies
5. DJP, “Program Pengungkapan Sukarela,” DJP Beranda. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.pajak.go.id/id/PPS
6. A. B. Wardana, “A Historical Overview of The Most Successful Tax Amnesty Policies in Indonesia,” JKAP (Jurnal Kebijak. dan Adm. Publik), vol. 28, no. 2, p. 107, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.22146/jkap.95135.
7. D. Siswanto, “Bersiap! Peserta Tax Amnesty Bakal Diperiksa Lagi, DJP Cek Harta yang Belum Diungkap,” Kontan.co.id: Nasional.
8. D. Siswanto, “Ditjen Pajak Kembali Periksa Peserta Tax Amnesty, Harta Belum Diungkap Jadi Sasaran,” Kontan.co.id: Nasional. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/ditjen-pajak-kembali-periksa-peserta-tax-amnesty-harta-belum-diungkap-jadi-sasaran
9. S. Shelvi and T. Rachmawati, “How Public Trust Matters to Future Taxpayer Compliance in Indonesia,” BISNIS BIROKRASI J. Ilmu Adm. dan Organ., vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.20476/jbb.v33i1.1608.
10. Y. Uliarta and A. M. Ilham, “Indonesia needs rel tax reform, not another amnesty,” East Asia Forum: South East Asia - Politics. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://eastasiaforum.org/2025/04/12/indonesia-needs-real-tax-reform-not-another-amnesty/
11. M. R. A. Nugroho, “Tax Amnesty Jilid III Usulan DPR, Prabowo Bisa Tolak!,” CNBC Indonesia News.
12. I. Estherina, “Indonesia Plans to Run Third Tax Amnesty Program,” TEMPO English: Economy & Business. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://en.tempo.co/read/1943769/indonesia-plans-to-run-third-tax-amnesty-program
13. Indradi, “Repeated Tax Amnesties in Indonesia: An Evaluation of Tax Compliance,” Ilomata Int. J. Tax Account., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 385–406, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.52728/ijtc.v4i3.759.
14. N. S. Rosidah and I. W. Sutirman, “Analysis of the Impact of Tax Amnesty Policy Repetition on Tax Compliance and State Revenue in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Adv. Res., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1721–1732, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.55927/ijar.v4i7.15022.
15. S. Masitoh, “Rencana Tax Amnesty Jilid III, Purbaya: Nanti Semuanya Nyelundupin Duit,” Kontan.co.id: Nasional. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/rencana-tax-amnesty-jilid-iii-purbaya-nanti-semuanya-nyeludupin-duit
16. C. Cunayah, G. E. Saputro, and S. Murtiana, “Analysis of Tax Amnesty Policy in Enhancing Economic Resilience,” J. Innov. Teach. Instr. Media, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1068–1081, 2025.
17. S. Rechberger, M. Hartner, E. Kirchler, and F. K. Hammerle, “Tax Amnesties, Justice Perceptions, and Filing Behavior: A Simulation Study,” Law Policy, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 214–225, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.2009.00316.x.
18. J. Alm, M. McKee, and W. Beck, “Amazing Graze: Tax Amnesties and Compliance,” Natl. Tax J., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 23–37, Mar. 1990, doi: 10.1086/NTJ41788822.
19. F. A. Amalia, “Slippery Slope Framework: Motivasi Pembayaran Pajak dan Kepatuhan Pajak,” El Muhasaba J. Akunt., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 92–101, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.18860/em.v12i1.11020.
20. I. N. P. Yasa and I. P. H. Martadinata, “Taxpayer Compliance from the Perspective of Slippery Slope Theory: An Experimental Study,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 53–61, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.9744/jak.20.2.53-61.
21. Linawati and S. Djaddang, “Tax Compliance Berbasis Slippery Slope Model: A Systematic Literature Review of Correlations,” JGIA J. Greenation Ilmu Akunt., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 80–90, 2024, doi: 10.38035/jgia.v2i2.
22. N. K. Sukasih, I. P. M. Astawa, and J. Susanti, “Balancing Trust and Power in Digital Tax Reform: Insights from Tax Practitioners on CTAS Effectiveness in Indonesia,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2025 - Advances in Economics, Business, and Management Research 361, 1st ed., M. U. H. Al Rasyid, Ed., 2025, pp. 128–135. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-938-4_16.
23. S. Camellia and R. J. Putra, “Public Trust on Taxpayer Compliance in Indonesia,” Saudi J. Econ. Financ., vol. 7, no. 07, pp. 357–364, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.36348/sjef.2023.v07i07.005.
24. Adriansyah, A. H. Rais, and Andi Nurrahma Gaffar, “Mapping Global Research Trends on Tax Amnesty: A A Scoping Review of Policy Designs, Behavioral Responses, and Fiscal Outcomes (2015–2025),” J. Pabean, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–58, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.61141/pabean.v8i1.810.
25. B. Juanda, L. Anggraeni, P. Mahestyanti, and B. R. Kurniawan, “A study on tax compliance in tax amnesty policy,” J. Perspekt. Pembiayaan dan Pembang. Drh., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 131–146, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.22437/ppd.v10i3.19572.
26. V. Lingga, “Second tax amnesty suffers from moral hazard,” The Jakarta Post: Indonesia. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.thejakartapost.com/paper/2022/07/06/second-tax-amnesty-suffers-from-moral-hazard.html
27. DDTC, “Harta Belum Diungkap, Peserta Tax Amnesty Tak Ikut PPS? Ini Risikonya,” DDTC News: Program Pengungkapan Sukarela. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://news.ddtc.co.id/berita/nasional/40059/harta-belum-diungkap-peserta-tax-amnesty-tak-ikut-pps-ini-risikonya
28. I. N. Tingkes, I. K. Sirna, I. M. Sumartana, and I. A. P. S. Widnyani, “The challenges of tax policy: a literature study on market and welfare dynamics,” JPPI (Jurnal Penelit. Pendidik. Indones., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 942–952, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.29210/020245050.
29. S. N. Putra, M. Astuti, and A. Munandar, “Literature Review: Implementation of Carbon Tax in Indonesia,” IIJSE Indones. Interdiscip. J. Sharia Econ., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1488–1497, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i1.4566.
30. MUC, “PPS Resmi Ditutup, Harta Bersih yang Terungkap Rp 594,82 triliun,” MUC Consulting News. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://muc.co.id/id/article/pps-resmi-ditutup-harta-bersih-yang-terungkap-rp-59482-triliun
31. D. Siswanto, “Peserta Tax Amnesty Kembali Diperiksa, Kepercayaan Wajib Pajak Dikhawatirkan Tergerus,” Kontan.co.id: Nasional. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/peserta-tax-amnesty-kembali-diperiksa-kepercayaan-wajib-pajak-dikhawatirkan-tergerus
32. A. K. M. Simanjuntak, “Targetkan Pajak Tumbuh Tinggi, DJP Kencangkan Audit hingga Pemeriksaan,” DDTC News: Pengawasan Pajak. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://news.ddtc.co.id/berita/nasional/1819204/targetkan-pajak-tumbuh-tinggi-djp-kencangkan-audit-hingga-pemeriksaan
33. SCMP, “Indonesia seeks extra tax from rich to plug budget deficit: ‘hunting in zoo,’” South China Morning Post: Indonesia. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast-asia/article/3337256/indonesia-seeks-extra-tax-rich-plug-budget-deficit-hunting-zoo
34. S. Widhartanto and V. Braithwaite, “Hunting Animals in a Zooo? Regulating Indonesia’s High Wealth Individual Taxpayers,” SSRN Electron. J., 2016, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2736617.
35. J. Darmawan, G. D. Muhammad, M. W. Askar, B. Fikri, and B. Muhammad, “Dengan Hormat, Pejabat Negara Jangan Menarik Pajak seperti Berburu di Kebun Binatang,” Jakarta, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://celios.co.id/dengan-hormat-pejabat-negara-jangan-menarik-pajak-seperti-berburu-di-kebun-binatang/
36. N. Noked, V. Wöhrer, and P. Lai, “Formal vs. Informal Voluntary Disclosure Policies,” Am. J. Comp. Law, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 75–108, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1093/ajcl/avae015.
37. A. C. Ehinger, J. A. Lee, B. Stomberg, and E. Towery, “Let’s Talk About Tax: The Determinants and Consequences of Income Tax Mentions During Conference Calls,” J. Am. Tax. Assoc., no. October, 2023, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3009390.
38. E. Kirchler, E. Hoelzl, and I. Wahl, “Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The ‘slippery slope’ framework,” J. Econ. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 210–225, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004.
39. OECD, Tax Morale: What Drives People and Businesses to Pay Tax? Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. doi: 10.1787/f3d8ea10-en.
40. W. Prichard, A. Custers, R. Dom, S. Davenport, and M. Roscitt, “Innovations in Tax Compliance: Conceptual Framework,” 9032, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/816431569957130111/pdf/Innovations-in-Tax-Compliance-Conceptual-Framework.pdf
41. C. Koch and C. Müller, “Tax amnesties and the insurance effect: An experimental study,” J. Behav. Exp. Econ., vol. 108, p. 102130, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102130.
42. E. Castro and C. Scartascini, “Research Insights: Do Tax Amnesties Really Work?,” Washington, D. C., Jul. 2020. doi: 10.18235/0002520.
43. P. Gil, J. Holz, J. List, A. Simon, and A. Zentner, “Toward an Understanding of Tax Amnesties: Theory and Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment,” Cambridge, MA, May 2023. doi: 10.3386/w31210.
44. MEF, “Voluntary disclosure: 3,8 miliardi di gettito e oltre 129mila instanze Il bilancio dell’operazione presentato oggi al Mef,” MEF Communicatio Stampa. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/portale/documents/20143/313750/Cs%2B09122015%2BConf%2Bstampa%2Bvoluntary%2Bdisclosure_191_Com.%2Bst.%2BRisultati%2Bvoluntary%2B09.12.2015.pdf/61cea7e3-68f7-1c13-941a-8da5a3e32ad1
45. A. Angeli, P. Lattarulo, E. Palmieri, and M. G. Pazienza, “Tax evasion and tax amnesties in regional taxation,” Econ. Polit., vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 343–369, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40888-023-00297-9.
46. T. P. Fortsakis, “The limitation period of the State’s right to impose taxes, fees, levies,” FDMA. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://fdmalaw.com/2015/06/11/the-limitation-period-of-the-states-right-to-impose-taxes-fees-levies/
47. A. Okello, S. Markov, C. Wang, E.-S. Gregou, E. Dabla-Norris, and G. Pitsilis, “Tax Administration Reform in Greece: Outcomes and Lessons (2010–25),” IMF Notes, vol. 2026, no. 003, p. 1, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.5089/9798229041812.068.
48. V. Argyropoulou, “‘Coming in from the Cold’ The Latest Tax Amnesty in Greece and Lessons for the Future,” Univ. Calif. Davis J. Int. Law Policy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://jilp.law.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk15346/files/media/documents/JILP-24-2-24-2-ARGYROPOULOU.pdf
49. Argentina, “Decreto N° 1206/2016 Regimen de Sinceramiento Fiscal,” Arca Biblioteca Electronica. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://biblioteca.afip.gob.ar/dcp/DEC_C_001206_2016_11_29
50. J. Londoño-Vélez and D. Tortarolo, “Revealing 21% of GDP in hidden assets: Evidence from Argentina,” J. Public Econ., vol. 250, p. 105471, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105471.
51. Republic of South Africa, “Exchange Control Amnesty and Amendment of Taxation Laws Act 2003,” Government Gazette. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/a12-03.pdf
52. South African Government, “Revenue Service on success of Special Voluntary Disclosure Programme: SARS reaches R3,3 billion mark in SVDP,” Republic of South Africa: Media Statements. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.za/news/media-statements/revenue-service-success-special-voluntary-disclosure-programme-08-mar-2018
53. Republica Brazilia, “Lei No 13.254, de 13 de Janeiro de 2016.” Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/lei/l13254.htm
54. Ministerio da Fazenda Brazilia, “Receita Federal abre programa para regularização de bens no Brasil e no exterior,” Receita Federal: Assuntos Noticias 2024. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2024/setembro/receita-federal-abre-programa-para-regularizacao-de-bens-no-brasil-e-no-exterior
55. FGV EBAPE, “Administração de Empresas: Study evaluates the impact of tax amnesties on public policies,” Sao Paulo School of Business Administration. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://eaesp.fgv.br/en/news/study-evaluates-impact-tax-amnesties-public-policies
56. H. S. Luitel and R. S. Sobel, “The Revenue Impact of Repeated Tax Amnesties,” Public Budg. Financ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 19–38, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00881.x.
57. M. Lauletta and F. Montano Campos, “Is the forgiveness of a tax amnesty divine? Evidence from Argentina,” Int. Tax Public Financ., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1229–1248, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10797-023-09799-5.
58. ARCA, “ARCA detalla los datos del Régimen de Regularización de Activos,” ARCA Novedades. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://servicioscf.afip.gob.ar/publico/sitio/contenido/novedad/ver.aspx?id=4409
59. M. Purwaningsih, “Tax Amnesty: Tax Flash,” Tax Indones., no. 9, pp. 1–7, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.pwc.com/id/en/taxflash/assets/english/2016/taxflash-2016-09.pdf
60. South African Government, “Treasury on launch of special voluntary disclosure programme,” South African Government: Official Information and Services. Accessed: May 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.za/speeches/treasury-launch-special-voluntary-disclosure-programme-30-sep-2016-0000
61. K. Fotiadis and P. Chatzoglou, “The tax morale of exhausted taxpayers. The case of Greece,” Const. Polit. Econ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 354–377, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10602-021-09349-3.
62. K. Fotiadis and P. Chatzoglou, “Tax Morale: Direct and Indirect Paths between Trust Factors: Empirical Evidence from Greece,” J. Econ. Issues, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1066–1100, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1080/00213624.2021.1994788.
63. D. Prastiwi and E. Diamastuti, “Building Trust and Enhancing Tax Compliance: The Role of Authoritarian Procedures and Respectful Treatment in Indonesia,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 16, no. 8, p. 375, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jrfm16080375.
64. B. Torgler, “Tax Morale and Compliance: Review of Evidence and Case Studies for Europe,” 5922, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/862221468282310839/pdf/WPS5922.pdf