Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research

For many years, U.S. financial institutions have relied on manual, investigator-based workflows to generate Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). In today's era of financial crime, filing of SARs under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) continues to be inefficient, time-consuming, and prone to error. Manual reporting is a huge challenge as consumers report $12.5 billion in fraud losses in 2024 and financial institutions report more than 4 million SARs each year. Today, institutions have spent a lot of money on automated fraud detection and RegTech solutions and yet, despite these investments, not many institutions can reap significant benefits since automated solutions are often thought of as technology solutions, and not as a transformation of the organization, its processes and people. This narrative review collates peer-reviewed literature across the four themes of the organizational and structural drivers for the transition, change management frameworks for adoption, design and governance characteristics of automated systems, and measured business and compliance impact on the transition to automated systems from 2020 until 2026. However, results from the review demonstrate that the ability to implement structured change management, explain systems to the regulator, align the system with the regulation, and measure performance are significant to achieving automation success, and not just the technical capability itself. These results give compliance officers and financial institution executives a single source of evidence to inform their fraud reporting automation investments and maximize impact.

Fraud Reporting Automation, Suspicious Activity Reports, Financial Institutions, Change Management.

1. Bagherifam, N., Naghdi, S., Ahmadian, V., Fazlzadeh, A., & Baghalzadeh Shishehgarkhaneh, M. (2025). Digital regulatory governance: The role of RegTech and SupTech in transforming financial oversight and administrative capacity. International Journal of Financial Studies, 13(4), 217.
2. Berjawi, O., Fenza, G., & Loia, V. (2023). A comprehensive survey of detection and prevention approaches for online radicalization: Identifying gaps and future directions. IEEE Access, 11, 120463–120491.
3. Boateng, V., Amoako, E. K., Bonsu, M. A., & Oman-Amoako, M. (2025). Assessing the impact of machine learning model on identifying terrorism financing patterns within the U.S. financial industry. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(6), Article 62486. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2025/6/62486
4. Brenner, Z. (2024). Blockchain's Achilles' heel: How interoperability gaps threaten decentralization and invite regulatory scrutiny. Loyola University Chicago Journal of Regulatory Compliance, Spring.
5. Cosa, M., & Torelli, R. (2024). Digital transformation and flexible performance management: A systematic literature review of the evolution of performance measurement systems. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 25(3), 445–466.
6. Devanga, S. V. (2023). Significance of regulatory technology and its impact on banks and financial institutions amongst the growth of decentralized finance (Master's thesis). National College of Ireland, Dublin.
7. Ferreira, J. J., Cruz, B., Veiga, P. M., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2024). Knowledge strategies and digital technologies maturity: Effects on small business performance. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 36(1–2), 36–54.
8. Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, National Credit Union Administration, & Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. (2025, October 9). Frequently asked questions regarding suspicious activity reporting requirements. U.S. Department of the Treasury. https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2025-10/SAR-FAQs-October-2025.pdf
9. Fulford, S. (2026). US consumers' financial exposure to fraud and scams. Available at SSRN 6396678.
10. Irfan, M., Dias, R. T., Hooda, J., Singh, K. A., & Bang, S. (2025). AI's impact on financial services, auditing, and investment strategies: The future ahead. In AI's transformative impact on finance, auditing, and investment (pp. 183–224). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
11. Jeyasingh, B. B. F. (2023). Impact of RegTech on compliance risk due to financial misconduct in the United States banking industry. Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 24.
12. Karakuş, M., & Yalçın, C. (2024). Digital transformation and organizational change management: Theoretical models and case studies. New Trends and Frontiers in Engineering, 344–376.
13. Oyekunle, S. M., Popoola, A. D., Kolo, F. H. O., Ogunmolu, A. M., & Adesokan-Imran, T. O. (2025). Intelligent fraud prevention information banking: A data governance-centric approach using behavioural biometrics. Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 18(5), 525–543.
14. Pavlidis, G. (2023). Deploying artificial intelligence for anti-money laundering and asset recovery: The dawn of a new era. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(7), 155–166.
15. Pocher, N., Zichichi, M., Merizzi, F., Shafiq, M. Z., & Ferretti, S. (2023). Detecting anomalous cryptocurrency transactions: An AML/CFT application of machine learning-based forensics. Electronic Markets, 33(1), 37.
16. Rafiq, M., & Sohail, M. K. (2025). Adopting regulatory technology for anti-money laundering in banking: Key enablers and barriers in a RegTech model. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101377.
17. Reports by Banks of Suspicious Transactions, 31 C.F.R. § 1020.320 (2024). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-31/subtitle-B/chapter-X/part-1020/subpart-C/section-1020.320
18. Sarna, N. J., Rithen, F. A., Jui, U. S., Belal, S., Amin, A., Oishee, T. K., & Islam, A. M. (2025). AI driven fraud detection models in financial networks: A review. IEEE Access, 13, 141204–141233.
19. Sheshadri, K. (2025). Analysis on importance and effectiveness of suspicious activity reporting (SAR) for the anti-money laundering process of investment banks in India (Master's thesis). National College of Ireland, Dublin.
20. Tucker, O. (2024). Risk-based customer due diligence is the key to effectively managing financial crime risk. Journal of Financial Compliance, 8(1), 65–79.