Climate-Resilient Inclusive Banking in State-Owned Commercial Banks: a Five-Level Governance Model for Bangladesh

Author's Information:

Niger Sultana

Senior Principal Officer, Sonali Bank PLC, Bangladesh

Md. Aminul Islam

Islami Bank Bangladesh PLC, Bangladesh. Md. Aminul Islam, Officer; Md. Baharul Hasan, Officer; Ummey Sumaiya, Islamic Banking Professional & Researcher

Md. Baharul Hasan

Islami Bank Bangladesh PLC, Bangladesh. Md. Aminul Islam, Officer; Md. Baharul Hasan, Officer; Ummey Sumaiya, Islamic Banking Professional & Researcher

Md. Shahed Alamm

CSAA; Islamic Banking and Finance Professional; Senior Manager, Islamic Financing Division, Bangladesh Finance PLC, Bangladesh. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5203-0866

Ummey Sumaiya

Islami Bank Bangladesh PLC, Bangladesh. Md. Aminul Islam, Officer; Md. Baharul Hasan, Officer; Ummey Sumaiya, Islamic Banking Professional & Researcher

Vol 03 No 10 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 10 October 2026

Page No.: 619-633

Abstract:

Purpose: Bangladesh needs its banks to finance climate adaptation while protecting both vulnerable borrowers and bank balance sheets from physical and transition risks. State-owned commercial banks (SOCBs) have national reach and public mandates, yet they carry some of the weakest asset quality in the system. This paper asks how SOCBs can integrate climate risk management with inclusive lending without excluding the communities most exposed to climate hazards.

Design/methodology/approach: The study uses a structured policy review and institutional design method. It analyzes Bangladesh Bank’s sustainable finance, environmental and social risk, disclosure and climate risk instruments (2020–2025), recent supervisory statistics, the World Bank’s Country Climate and Development Report, international standards (NGFS, BCBS, TCFD, IFRS S2) and peer-reviewed research on climate-related credit risk and state bank governance.

Findings: Taxonomy-based green classification is necessary but insufficient. In April–June 2026, SOCBs channeled about 1.6 percent of their term-loan disbursement to green finance, against roughly 12.1 percent for the system. With non-performing loans near 44 percent of SOCB credit, climate lending without location-aware underwriting, verified adaptation and governance safeguards risks creating new distressed assets.

Originality/value: The paper proposes a Climate-Resilient Inclusive Banking (CRIB) model that assigns decisions, evidence and inclusion safeguards across five levels: board, portfolio, product, branch and customer.

Implications: The model offers SOCB boards and Bangladesh Bank a practical route to implement the 2025 climate risk guideline, separate policy-directed from commercial exposure, and report adaptation outcomes rather than disbursement volumes alone.

KeyWords:

climate risk; sustainable finance; state-owned banks; adaptation finance; financial inclusion; bank governance; Bangladesh JEL Classification: G21; G28; G32; H81; Q54; Q56

References:

  1. Alamm, M. S., Zahid, Z., Nipa, N. N., & Khalil, I. (2025). Harnessing FinTech and Islamic finance for climate resilience: A sustainable future through Islamic social finance and microfinance. Humanities and Social Sciences, 13(3),  207–218. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20251303.12
  2. Andrianova, S., Demetriades, P., & Shortland, A. (2012). Government ownership of banks, institutions and economic growth. Economica, 79(315), 449–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2011.00904.x
  3. Azad, M. A. K., Islam, M. A., Sobhani, F. A., Hassan, M. S., & Masukujjaman, M. (2022). Revisiting the current status of green finance and sustainable finance disbursement: A policy insights. Sustainability, 14(14), Article 8911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148911
  4. Bangladesh Bank. (2020). Sustainable finance policy for banks and financial institutions (SFD Circular No. 05, 31 December 2020). Sustainable Finance Department. https://www.bb.org.bd/mediaroom/circulars/gbcrd/dec312020sfd05.pdf
  5. Bangladesh Bank. (2022). Guidelines on environmental & social risk management (ESRM) for banks and financial institutions in Bangladesh (SFD Circular No. 03, 26 June 2022). Sustainable Finance Department. https://www.bb.org.bd/mediaroom/circulars/gbcrd/jun262022sfd03e.pdf
  6. Bangladesh Bank. (2023). Guideline on sustainability and climate-related financial disclosure (SFD Circular No. 06, 26 December 2023). Sustainable Finance Department. https://www.bb.org.bd/mediaroom/circulars/gbcrd/dec262023sfd06e.pdf
  7. Bangladesh Bank. (2025a). Financial stability report 2024. https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/annual/fsr/financial%20stability%20report%202024.pdf
  8. Bangladesh Bank. (2025b). Guideline on climate risk management for banks and finance companies (SFD Circular No. 01, 6 November 2025). Sustainable Finance Department. https://www.bb.org.bd/mediaroom/circulars/gbcrd/nov062025sfd01e.pdf
  9. Bangladesh Bank. (2026). Quarterly review report on sustainable finance: April–June 2026. Sustainable Finance Department. https://www.bb.org.bd/pub/quaterly/greenbanking/sf%20report%20june%2026_final.pdf
  10. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2021). Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d517.htm
  11. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2022). Principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d532.htm
  12. Battiston, S., Mandel, A., Monasterolo, I., Schütze, F., & Visentin, G. (2017). A climate stress-test of the financial system. Nature Climate Change, 7(4), 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3255
  13. Berg, G., & Schrader, J. (2012). Access to credit, natural disasters, and relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(4), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2012.05.003
  14. Bertay, A. C., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2015). Bank ownership and credit over the business cycle: Is lending by state banks less procyclical? Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.012
  15. Bhandary, R. R., Gallagher, K. S., & Zhang, F. (2021). Climate finance policy in practice: A review of the evidence. Climate Policy, 21(4), 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1871313
  16. Bolton, P., Despres, M., Pereira da Silva, L. A., Samama, F., & Svartzman, R. (2020). The green swan: Central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/othp31.htm
  17. Bose, S., Khan, H. Z., Rashid, A., & Islam, S. (2018). What drives green banking disclosure? An institutional and corporate governance perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(2), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-017-9528-x
  18. Brei, M., & Schclarek, A. (2013). Public bank lending in times of crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 9(4), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2013.01.002
  19. Campiglio, E., Dafermos, Y., Monnin, P., Ryan-Collins, J., Schotten, G., & Tanaka, M. (2018). Climate change challenges for central banks and financial regulators. Nature Climate Change, 8, 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-01750
  20. Chowdhury, M. A., Hasan, M. K., & Islam, S. L. U. (2022). Climate change adaptation in Bangladesh: Current practices, challenges and the way forward. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 6, Article 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2021.100108
  21. Cortés, K. R., & Strahan, P. E. (2017). Tracing out capital flows: How financially integrated banks respond to natural disasters. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(1), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.04.011
  22. Dafermos, Y., Nikolaidi, M., & Galanis, G. (2018). Climate change, financial stability and monetary policy. Ecological Economics, 152, 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.011
  23. Dastagir, R. (2015). Modeling recent climate change induced extreme events in Bangladesh: A review. Weather and Climate Extremes, 7, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014.10.003
  24. Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64
  25. Dhaka Tribune. (2026, August 19). NPLs in 5 state-owned banks up by Tk6,304cr in H1 2026. https://www.dhakatribune.com/business/banks/417857/npls-in-5-state-owned-banks-up-by-tk6-304cr-in-h1
  26. Dinç, I. S. (2005). Politicians and banks: Political influences on government-owned banks in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(2), 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.011
  27. D’Orazio, P., & Popoyan, L. (2019). Fostering green investments and tackling climate-related financial risks: Which role for macroprudential policies? Ecological Economics, 160, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.029
  28. Financial Institutions Division. (2021). National financial inclusion strategy (NFIS), July 2021–June 2026. Ministry of Finance, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. https://afi-global.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/NFIS_Bangladesh.pdf
  29. Giglio, S., Kelly, B., & Stroebel, J. (2021). Climate finance. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 13, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-102620-103311
  30. Hallegatte, S., Vogt-Schilb, A., Bangalore, M., & Rozenberg, J. (2017). Unbreakable: Building the resilience of the poor in the face of natural disasters. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1003-9
  31. Hasan, M. M. (2025, November 26). Default loans hit 34%, highest in 25 years. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/business/news/default-loans-hit-34-highest-25-years-4043561
  32. Hasan, M. M. (2026, March 3). Bad loans fall by Tk 87,298cr in three months. The Daily Star. https://www.thedailystar.net/business/economy/news/bad-loans-fall-tk-87298cr-three-months-4119206
  33. Hasan, M. N., & Khan, S. N. (2021). Insights and field-level experiences of non-performing loans in Bangladesh: The case of state-owned commercial banks (SOCBs). Dhaka University Journal of Business Studies, 42(1), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbst.v42i1.59965
  34. Hossain, M. K., Rahman, F., Golder, U., & Kabir, H. (2025). Effectiveness of internal corporate governance mechanisms in controlling non-performing loans of an emerging economy. Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 77(4), 1011–1038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41471-025-00216-7
  35. Huang, B., Punzi, M. T., & Wu, Y. (2021). Do banks price environmental transition risks? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, Article 101983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101983
  36. International Sustainability Standards Board. (2023). IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/
  37. IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
  38. Javadi, S., & Masum, A.-A. (2021). The impact of climate change on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69, Article 102019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102019
  39. Khairunnessa, F., Vazquez-Brust, D. A., & Yakovleva, N. (2021). A review of the recent developments of green banking in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041904
  40. Klomp, J. (2014). Financial fragility and natural disasters: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Stability, 13, 180–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2014.06.001
  41. Krogstrup, S., & Oman, W. (2019). Macroeconomic and financial policies for climate change mitigation: A review of the literature (IMF Working Paper No. 19/185). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513511955.001
  42. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). Government ownership of banks. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 265–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00422
  43. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  44. Micco, A., Panizza, U., & Yañez, M. (2007). Bank ownership and performance. Does politics matter? Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(1), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.02.007
  45. Möllmann, J., Buchholz, M., Kölle, W., & Musshoff, O. (2020). Do remotely-sensed vegetation health indices explain credit risk in agricultural microfinance? World Development, 127, Article 104771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104771
  46. Monasterolo, I. (2020). Climate change and the financial system. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 12, 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110119-031134
  47. Network for Greening the Financial System. (2020). Guide for supervisors: Integrating climate-related and environmental risks into prudential supervision. NGFS. https://www.ngfs.net/system/files/import/ngfs/medias/documents/ngfs_guide_for_supervisors.pdf
  48. Nguyen, D., Ongena, S., Qi, S., & Sila, V. (2022). Climate change risk and the cost of mortgage credit. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1509–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac013
  49. Nipa, N. N., Zahid, Z., Amin, M. R., Alamm, M. S., Haque, Z. M. E., & Parves, M. M. (2026). Harnessing Islamic FinTech for disaster risk financing: Innovative strategies for economic resilience and sustainable development. Journal of Islamic Economics Lariba, 12(1), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.20885/jielariba.vol12.iss1.art9
  50. Noth, F., & Schüwer, U. (2023). Natural disasters and bank stability: Evidence from the U.S. financial system. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 119, Article 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102792
  51. Robin, I., Salim, R., & Bloch, H. (2018). Financial performance of commercial banks in the post-reform era: Further evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Analysis and Policy, 58, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2018.01.001
  52. Sapienza, P. (2004). The effects of government ownership on bank lending. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(2), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2002.10.002
  53. Shoji, M. (2010). Does contingent repayment in microfinance help the poor during natural disasters? Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902952381
  54. Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures: Final report. Financial Stability Board. https://www.fsb.org/uploads/P291020-2.pdf
  55. Uddin, M. M., Islam, M. T., & Al Farooque, O. (2023). Effects of politically controlled boards on bank loan performance: An emerging economy perspective. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 13(3), 566–588. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-11-2021-0353
  56. World Bank. (2022a). Bangladesh country climate and development report. World Bank Group. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/38181
  57. World Bank. (2022b, October 31). Key highlights: Country climate and development report for Bangladesh [Feature story]. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2022/10/31/key-highlights-country-climate-and-development-report-for-bangladesh
  58. Zahid, Z. (2026). Islamic FinTech and green AI for enhancing climate-resilient agriculture in South Asia: Lessons from green water economics and deforestation impacts. International Journal of Modern Science and Research Technology, 4(1), 188–204. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18384347