Foreign Direct Investment in Tanzania: do Tax Exemptions Still Matter? Evidence from a Vector Error Correction Model

Author's Information:

Mohamed Hamdan Idrisa

Department of Fiscal and Financial Policy Ministry of Finance and Planning-Zanzibar

Vicent Stanslaus

Lecturer: The Open University of Tanzania

Suleiman Malik Faki

lecturer: Zanzibar University

Vol 03 No 10 (2026):Volume 03 Issue 10 October 2026

Page No.: 634-646

Abstract:

This study investigates the relationship between tax exemptions and foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows in Tanzania using annual time series data covering the period 1985-2020. According to the Tanzania Investment Centre and Zanzibar Investment Promotion Authority (Zanzibar Investment Act No.10 of 2023): qualifying investment projects may benefit from fiscal incentives, including import duty relief on eligible capital goods and investment-related equipment. The study was motivated by the continued use of tax exemptions as an investment-promotion instrument despite mixed empirical evidence regarding their effectiveness in attracting foreign investment. The analysis employed the Augmented Dickey Fuller unit root test, Johansen cointegration test and Vector Error Correction Model (VECM). The unit root results showed that the variables were predominantly integrated of order one, I(1), while the Johansen test confirmed the existence of a stable long-run relationship among the variables. The VECM results indicate that tax exemption has a positive and statistically significant relationship with FDI inflows in Tanzania. Specifically, the estimated coefficient of tax exemption was 0.302402, implying that a 1 percent increase in tax exemption is associated with approximately a 0.302 percent increase in FDI, holding other factors constant. The findings therefore suggest that tax exemptions can contribute to attracting foreign investment, although the response of FDI is less than proportionate. The study concludes that tax exemptions should be used selectively and complemented by improvements in the broader investment environment. It recommends that the Government of Tanzania adopt targeted, transparent and performance based tax incentives and regularly assess the fiscal cost of exemptions against the additional investment generated.

KeyWords:

Tax exemption, foreign direct investment, Tanzania, VECM, tax incentives.

References:

  1. Abille, A. B., & Mumuni, S. (2023). Tax incentives, ease of doing business and inflows of FDI in Africa: Does governance matter? Cogent Economics & Finance, 11(1), 2164555. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2164555
  2. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Sayek, S. (2004). FDI and economic growth: The role of local financial markets. Journal of International Economics, 64(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00081-3
  3. Andoh, F. K., & Cantah, W. G. (2022). Foreign direct investment in Sub-Saharan Africa: Is tax obligation still an issue? Global Business Review, 23(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919890241
  4. Appiah-Kubi, S. N. K., Malec, K., Phiri, J., Maitah, M., Gebeltová, Z., Smutka, L., Blazek, V., Maitah, K., & Sirohi, J. (2021). Impact of tax incentives on foreign direct investment: Evidence from Africa. Sustainability, 13(15), 8661. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158661
  5. Celani, A., Dressler, L., & Wermelinger, M. (2022). Building an investment tax incentives database: Methodology and initial findings for 36 developing countries (OECD Working Papers on International Investment No. 2022/01). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/62e075a9-en
  6. Celani, A., L. Dressler and T. Hanappi (2022), “Assessing tax relief from targeted investment tax incentives through corporate effective tax rates: Methodology and initial findings for seven Sub-Saharan African countries”, OECD Taxation Working Papers, No. 58, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/3eaddf88-en.
  7. Coulibaly, S., & Camara, A. (2022). The end of tax incentives in mining? Tax policy and mining foreign direct investment in Africa. African Development Review, 34(S1), S177-S194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12651
  8. Crivelli, E., de Mooij, R. A., & Keen, M. (2015). Base erosion, profit shifting and developing countries (IMF Working Paper No. 2015/118). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513563831.001
  9. Devereux, M. P., & Griffith, R. (1998). Taxes and the location of production: Evidence from a panel of US multinationals. Journal of Public Economics, 68(3), 335-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00014-0
  10. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica,49(4), 1057–1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
  11. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490372
  12. Dunning, J. H. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 9(2), 163-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(99)00035-9
  13. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
  14. Granger, C. W. J., & Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(74)90034-7
  15. Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  16. Hall, R. E., & Jorgenson, D. W. (1967). Tax policy and investment behavior. American Economic Review, 57(3), 391-414. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1812110
  17. International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations, & World Bank. (2015). Options for low income countries' effective and efficient use of tax incentives for investment. https://www.imf.org/external/np/g20/pdf/101515a.pdf
  18. Javorcik, B. S. (2004). Does foreign direct investment increase the productivity of domestic firms? In search of spillovers through backward linkages. American Economic Review, 94(3), 605-627. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464605
  19. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,12(2-3), 231-254 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3
  20. Johansen, S., & Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52(2), 169-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52002003.x
  21. Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). Capital theory and investment behavior. American Economic Review, 53(2), 247-259. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1823868
  22. Klemm, A., & Van Parys, S. (2012). Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives. International Tax and Public Finance, 19, 393-423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-011-9194-8
  23. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Tax incentives and the global minimum corporate tax: Reconsidering tax incentives after the GloBE rules. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/25d30b96-en
  24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Sustainable investment policy perspectives in the Southern African Development Community. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/sustainable-investment-policy-perspectives-in-the-southern-african-development-community_02c9ef1d-en.html
  25. Tanzania Investment Centre. (n.d.). What are the benefits to register with the Centre? https://www.tic.go.tz/faqs/what-are-the-benefits-to-register-with-the-centre
  26. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). World investment report 2024: Investment facilitation and digital government. United Nations. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2024
  27. World Bank. (2017). Global investment competitiveness report 2017/2018: Foreign investor perspectives and policy implications. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1175-3