Index Evaluating Islamic and Conventional Stock Market Behavior in Indonesia: IHSG and JII Performance during Prabowo’s First Year in Office

Author's Information:

Muslim Marpaung

Politiknik Negeri Medan, Sumatera Utara, Indonesia

Oktavera Rizki

Faculty of Islamic Economics and Business Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Yunita Dalimunthe

STAI Al-Hikmah Tebing Tinggi

Nurul Muyasaroh

Universitas Islam Riau 

Vol 02 No 11 (2025):Volume 02 Issue 11 November 2025

Page No.: 1313-1339

Abstract:

Purpose: This study aims to examine and compare the performance behavior of Indonesia’s conventional and Islamic equity markets during the first year of President Prabowo Subianto’s administration (20 October 2024–20 October 2025). Specifically, it investigates how political transitions and early policy signals influenced the short-term and cumulative responses of the Indonesian Composite Index (IHSG) and the Jakarta Islamic Index (JII).

Materials and Methods: The research employs an event study methodology to calculate Abnormal Return (AR), Average Abnormal Return (AAR), and Cumulative Average Abnormal Return (CAAR) for both IHSG and JII, using daily index data throughout the observation window. To complement the event study analysis, a non-parametric Mann–Whitney U Test is conducted to determine whether significant differences exist between the return distributions of the two indices.

Results: The empirical findings reveal distinct differences in the market behavior of IHSG and JII. IHSG demonstrates higher volatility and greater responsiveness to macroeconomic announcements, fiscal policy directions, and geopolitical developments. In contrast, JII displays relatively more stable behavior in both abnormal and cumulative abnormal return measurements. The CAAR trends indicate that Islamic equities achieve more consistent cumulative gains, highlighting the relative resilience of Sharia-compliant investments during periods of political transition. Statistical testing through the Mann–Whitney U Test confirms significant divergence in AR patterns between the two indices.

Conclusion: The study concludes that conventional and Islamic equity markets in Indonesia respond differently to political transitions. JII exhibits more stable and resilient performance compared to IHSG, suggesting the potential stabilizing role of Islamic capital markets in emerging economies during periods of political adjustment. These results offer important implications for policymakers, investors, and financial regulators in evaluating risk, designing portfolio diversification strategies, and advancing the development of Islamic financial instruments.

KeyWords:

IHSG, Jakarta Islamic Index (JII), Event Study, Political Transition, Non-Parametric Test, Market Performance.

References:

  1. Ascarya, A., & Yumanita, D. (2008). Comparing the efficiency of Islamic banks in Malaysia and Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Economics, 1(2), 1–20. 
  2. Bialkowski, J., Gottschalk, K., & Wisniewski, T. (2008). Stock market volatility around national elections. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1941–1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.02.007 
  3. Brown, S. J., & Warner, J. B. (1985). Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X 
  4. Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The econometrics of financial markets. Princeton University Press.
  5. Chen, H., & Siems, T. F. (2004). The effects of terrorism on global capital markets. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(2), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2003.12.001 
  6. Corrado, C. J. (1989). A nonparametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90050-8 
  7. Corrado, C. J., & Zivney, T. L. (1992). The specification and power of the sign test in event study hypothesis tests using daily stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(3), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/2331368 
  8. Engle, R. F. (2002). Dynamic conditional correlation — a simple class of multivariate GARCH models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(3), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102288618487 
  9. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
  10. Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x
  11. Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/2525569 
  12. Goodell, J. W. (2020). COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101512
  13. Gunarta, D., & Budiawan, W. (2020). Election cycles and stock market behavior in Indonesia. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(4), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr/2020.10.4/102.4.456.470 
  14. Huda, N., & Nasution, M. E. (2017). Investasi pada pasar modal syariah. Kencana.
  15. Ihsan, I., & Nurfalah, L. (2020). Macroeconomic influences on Islamic and conventional stock indices in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 12(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.20473/jes.v12i1.2020.45-58 
  16. Kothari, S. P., & Warner, J. B. (2007). Econometrics of event studies. In B. E. Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook of corporate finance: Empirical corporate finance (Vol. 1, pp. 3–36). Elsevier.
  17. Lyon, J. D., Barber, B. M., & Tsai, C. L. (1999). Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 54(1), 165–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00109 
  18. MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.35.1.13 
  19. Mukmin, A., & Firmansyah, F. (2020). Analisis perbandingan volatilitas IHSG dan JII menggunakan model GARCH. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Perbankan Syariah, 3(1), 15–28.
  20. Nugraha, S. A., & Amalia, R. (2023). Comparative performance of JII and LQ45 during economic fluctuations. Journal of Islamic Finance, 8(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.37957/jif.v8i2.400 
  21. Patell, J. M. (1976). Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: Empirical tests. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2), 246–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490467 
  22. Peterson, P. P. (1989). Event studies: A review of issues and methodology. Journal of Accounting Literature, 7(1), 1–36.
  23. Prakoso, D. (2022). Macroeconomic determinants of IHSG and JII: An ARDL approach. Ekonomi Islam Indonesia, 4(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.36778/eii.v4i1.55-67
  24. Rahim, S., & Masih, M. (2018). Portfolio diversification benefits of Islamic equity indices: Evidence from global markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 45, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.08.005 
  25. Rahmawati, S., Fadilah, N., & Yusuf, A. (2022). Volatility transmission between Islamic and conventional indices in Indonesia during COVID-19. Jurnal Keuangan dan Perbankan, 26(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.26905/jkp.v26i2.233-245
  26. Suhaeni, T., & Ratnawati, L. (2021). Political events and their effects on Indonesian stock market performance. Journal of Economics and Policy, 14(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.22441/jep.v14i1.78-92 
  27. Yusuf, M., & Majid, M. S. A. (2020). Financial stability of Islamic versus conventional stock markets: Evidence from volatility estimation. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(3), 487–506. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-08-2019-0360