The Impact of Green and Ethical Marketing on Consumer Behavior in Sustainable Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55677/GJEFR/06-2025-Vol02E4Keywords:
Green Marketing, Ethical Marketing, Consumer Behavior, Sustainable Markets, Environmental ImpactAbstract
The growing awareness of environmental and social issues has significantly shifted consumer behavior, leading to a rising demand for sustainable and ethically-sourced products. In response, businesses have increasingly adopted green and ethical marketing strategies to align with the preferences of conscious consumers. This research explores the impact of these marketing approaches on consumer behavior in sustainable markets. Using a quantitative research design, the study employs surveys to collect data on consumers' attitudes toward green marketing (e.g., eco-friendly products, sustainability) and ethical marketing (e.g., fair trade, corporate social responsibility), as well as their purchasing behaviors. The sample consists of 100 respondents, selected through convenience sampling to ensure demographic diversity. Findings reveal that while a significant proportion of consumers have purchased eco-friendly products and express trust in green and ethical brands, the regression analysis indicates that income, location, and familiarity with green and ethical marketing do not significantly influence purchase decisions. These results highlight the importance of sustainability and ethical considerations in consumer decision-making. However, challenges such as the "attitude-behavior gap" remain, suggesting that businesses must overcome barriers such as price sensitivity and trust issues. Companies that effectively communicate their commitment to environmental and social responsibility through transparent marketing strategies may gain a competitive advantage in evolving sustainable markets.
References
1. Hossain, S., Hossen, M.S.B., Zim, S.K. and El Hebabi, I., 2024. Cultural dynamics and consumer behavior: An in-depth analysis of Chinese preferences for western imported products. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(3), pp.158-167.
2. Hossain, S. and Nur, T.I., 2024. Gear up for safety: Investing in a new automotive future in China. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(5), pp.731-746.
3. Hossain, S., 2025. Singapore Role in Advancing Global Low-Carbon Economy: A Joint Effort for Sustainability and Climate Commitments. American Journal of Business Science Philosophy (AJBSP), 2(1), pp.36-47.
4. Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., & Schweidler, M. (2013). The influence of ethical consumption on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 97-110.
5. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9-24.
6. Bratt, C., Hallstedt, S. I., Roberts, S. A., & Öhman, M. (2011). Social sustainability in supply chain management: A case study approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(14), 1504-1517.
7. Hossain, S., Hena, H. and Sampa, P., 2024. Decoding Consumer Habits: Analyzing Retail Patterns Across Demographics. Startupreneur Business Digital (SABDA Journal), 3(2), pp.148-159.
8. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
9. Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560-578.
10. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research, and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.
11. Cohen, L. (2013). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). Routledge.
12. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
13. Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey Research Methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
14. Hartmann, P., & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitudes towards eco-innovation: The role of self-image congruence. Journal of Business Research, 65(1), 110-118..
15. Hossain, S., Akon, T. and Hena, H., 2024. Do creative companies pay higher wages? Micro-level evidence from Bangladesh. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(10), pp.1724-1745.
16. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effects of corporate social responsibility on consumer attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 16-32.
17. Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and ends of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223-249.
18. Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(4), 357-370.
19. HOSSAIN, S. and HENA, H., 2024. The study explores the correlation between cultural influence and community engagement in fostering social safety for tourists.
20. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35-55.
21. Efficiency, S.C. and Sales, A.P., 2024. Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research.
22. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2001). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(4), 332-348.
23. Smith, N. C., & Brower, J. (2012). Longitudinal study of the relationship between ethical consumerism and purchasing behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 259-274.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Global Journal of Economic and Finance Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
